How Should We Speak to God? What Language Should We Use?

What if I began the Mass and said, “Hi God, its Marty, how are you going, we are all here today”? Of course we would say that is inappropriate language. But what is appropriate language?

The life of the Early Church for three hundred years was fraught with persecution and execution. So they tried to remain hidden from the Roman Imperial authorities – but many died refusing to compromise their faith in the Crucified an Risen Christ, because He died for them. So the Christian faith to them was amazing, beautiful and true. It was an amazing treasure which opened their eyes to the wonder of creation and splendour of life. Of course, that all exploded in a life of creativity when Constantine the Great recognised the Christian faith. An energy that burst in creativity in making present in worship the wonder of faith in Christ. Now they were given magnificent Basilicas (the kings hall). Now the Mass could be presented in all its majesty and grandeur, following the worship in the Book of Revelation. From the time of Gregory the Great, Christian music, vestments, and beautiful churches flourished - but what about language – how do you speak to the King of kings and Lord of Lords?

To start of it was quite easy, use the Greek of the New Testament. It was originally language of the soldiers of Alexander the Great, known through the known world. However, it was Christianised by the Saint Paul in his letters, the Gospel writers, but especially Saint John. We hear the beauty of his imagery and poetry, even in English, every time we hear it in the Last Gospel at Mass. This was no longer the rough coarse language of soldiers. Latin was more difficult, and it took a couple of centuries to produce a form of Latin, which had all its pagan associations eliminated But it was not the Latin of every day Romans. It was dignified and reverent for worship in speaking to the Lord.

It is a mistake to think that our Books of Common Prayer (1549, 1552, 1662, 1928, and the English Missal from 1914) was a radical change. No. Cranmer used a high form of English, more suited to the Royal Court than the market place, for we are speaking to God our Father, and Christ our King. Archbishop Cranmer had the knowledge of Greek and Latin Christian worship to know what was needed – a continuity of reverence, veneration and devotion. The same is true of the Authorised Version of the Bible (King James). They used a form of English that was spoken of one hundred year before their time. Understandable, but different – but they went further. Each book was read out aloud to hear what it sounded like – for it must be beautiful and inspiring to hear as well as read.

There is something else we need to understand, originally the readings were done facing the Altar. It was sung, not said, because the readings were done as an act of worship to Our Lord, not for the edification of the congregation, and the congregation facing East shared in the act of worship. Another factor was the same readings were done each year around the same time of the year, so that it became a part of you, seeping into your bones and your heart over decades of listening – that cannot happen with the new three year lectionary, as it takes four years for a reading to be repeated. Repetition used to be the basic principle of education. - and Bible study at home is for understanding.

So we follow all of this in our worship at Morningside – we enter into a beautiful, church that smells like a church through the use of incense. The High Altar as the focus of our worship, which also has an impact different from every building and home in Brisbane. For here we are to worship in the tradition of the Mass that goes back to the time of freedom under Constantine and of Gregory the Great – we are linked to the spiritual identity of centuries of faithful Christians and Saints. We are literally orientated to the Holy Land of Our Lord, where he will return again. 

Trouble for the Church of England

No doubt many of you have heard at some stage the scandal over the management of the British Post Office, which began in 2009. In brief, an accounting programme, called ‘Horizon, developed by Fujitsu, a Japanese information and technology corporation, for large businesses. This was adopted by the British Post Office – but it was faulty. Problems emerged, as the programme recorded shortfalls, and between 1999 –2015, 900 local postmasters and mistresses were accused of fraud and embezzling money. Someone must have thought that this could not be right. The amounts were up to 35 thousand UK pounds. Court cases followed, but courts believed the ’experts’ and people were fined, went to jail, lost their homes and health. Four committed suicide. The real crime, however, was the management of the Post Office knew the program was faulty.

A judge ruled in 2019 after post masters and mistresses brought a class action against the British Post Office that there was a miscarriage of justice and was ordered to pay compensation. Leading up to that time it became evident that the executives has lied and committed perjury, and had lobbied parliamentarians for a coverup. One of the peers in the House of Lords, Lord Arbuthnot, who was also a successful business man, was key person in support of the postal workers, described the administration of the chief executive officer as "both cruel and incompetent."

So what has this to do with the Church of England? It is Paula Vennells, the then-Post Office chief executive 2012 - 2019. Paula Vennells had a long career as a business women. She then went to a part-time theological course and was ordained a deacon 2005 and priest 2006. Her ministry was in the Saint Alban’s Diocese, but because of her work only in minor tasks of assistance. However, because of her business experience she was taken on by the Archbishop of Canterbury to serve on various church committees, but her attendance was poor. Archbishop Welby also been a business man in the oil industry. Unfortunately, Welby believes that a business executive would be good in any area of administration. – including the Church – but a Church is not business. This process is now called the buisnessfication of the church turning it into a corporation.

The next step in this saga was Archbishop Welby favouring Vennells to be the Bishop of London, despite having no pastoral experience of being a parish priest, and limited qualifications, nor serving as an Archdeacon or Dean of a cathedral. She made the short list, but fortunately was not appointed. It was a narrow escape for the Church of England. She has now resigned all her priestly duties, but is still a priest.

When she resigned from the Post Office she was given a CBE – Commander of the Order of the British Empire, which is high honour – but with such an outcry she returned has returned it honour this year.

The real question now is the Archbishop of Canterbury exhibiting such lack of insight in the midst of a major scandal. However, this is now added to 75 t0 80% of the Anglican Communion not recognising him as the head of the Anglican Church. His leadership is now splitting the Church of England over a botched, ill thought out plan, and unwise venture in experimenting in blessing of same-sex marriages. Calls for his resignation are mounting. However, statistics of church attendance is taking a serious nose dive. One recent example is the Diocese of Manchester losing 50% of its regular worshippers. The total average attendance for Sunday services across the Church of England in 2013 was 1,009,100. By 2019, that figure had dropped to 854,00 – a decline of just over 15 % – but that was five years ago, and since we have had three years of Covid.

So, we need bishops who are teachers and pastors of Christ’s flock and not business executives.

Denial of Sin

In the traditional Mass there is a frequent and consistent mention about human frailty. In the Glory be to God on High we have; Thou that takest away the sins of the world, receive our prayer; In the Confession we acknowledge and bewail our manifold sins, and wickedness; At Communion we are not worthy so much as to gather up the crumbs under thy table. Even in the final phrase of the Prayer of Consecration we hear, yet we beseech thee to accept this our bounden duty and service; not weighing our merits, but pardoning our offences. Is this overdoing it all? Is this too much negativity? Well those who drafted the new Prayer Book thought so, and removed many of these phrases or made them optional for use.

Of course, the truthful answer, is what we hear in the news of human frailty, corruption, and sin is real, full, relentless, and unedited sin – including the health and safety of the elderly in nursing homes for profit margins. Now we can add youth crime, with deliberate acts of violence, theft and murder - and a powerless governments not knowing what to do.

The problem is a society that increasingly rejects the Christian faith and the thought of sin as being an offence against God. This is because sin is not taken seriously, and therefore the Gospel does not touch daily life, or the claim that the evidence of Jesus’ Divine nature is based on His power to forgive sin.

I think most people do not openly and plainly deny that there is God, but they do not believe that he has any importance to their daily life. Neither does anyone seriously think that wrong actions may concern God, or that it may be offensive to Him.

Of course some would they believe in a higher power – but that has no impact upon their lives. And the problem is not just non-believing people, the problem is within the Church itself. It is sad to say some ‘modernist’* theologians and clergy would advise against confessing sin, but rather in going to psychologists and counsellors for help – that sin does not exist as there are only problems to be sorted out by professionals. This attitude makes you wonder what our Lord was doing at Calvary, and was he just mucking around at his last meal, “Drink ye all of this; for this is my blood of the new testament, which is shed for you and for many for the remission of sins.” To forget this sacrificial offering of our Lord’s own life, is a turning away from the God whose face is turned towards the human race in the face of Jesus.

What are we to do? Well, we do have Lent to remind us of what we should be doing all year. After all, being a Christian can only take the path of becoming a Christian. No doubt, you will remember, my frequent mention that we have a confession in the Mass each week because of our lapses. Being a Christian means we constantly are starting again and again to be faithful and true – the alternative is just to simply turn into spiritual vegetables.

Lent is about our spiritual discipline to always to try and be faithful, and for that we a structure in our spiritual life. You have heard this before, but it can be dismissed as being trivial: READ the Bible, SAY your prayers, BE CONSISTENT AND REGULAR at Mass. Why? Sin is real, but God’s love is stronger. Christ is victorious over the reality of sin – and for our sakes.

In the Gospel for today our Lord talks about the strong man being overcome by someone who is stronger. Christ points to Himself as that stronger man, who overcomes the devil and takes away his possessions – failed humanity and set them free.

* modernist is a movement that ignores Scared Scripture and Christian Tradition as irrelevant, and use contemporary Ideas like Woke or Marxism.